|
68.8.1 The Family Court encourages the amicable resolution
of custody and visitation issues through mediation as a method of
focusing the attention of the parties on the best interest of the
child. In every dissolution of marriage, legal separation or paternity
action in which there are contested issues of custody and/or visitation,
the parties (except for the State of Missouri) shall complete mediation,
as provided in Supreme Court Rule 88.02-88.08 and this rule, prior
to the filing of a motion for trial setting. Any motion for trial
setting shall include an averment that mediation has been completed,
or that there are no contested issues regarding custody or visitation
of minor children, or that the case has been excluded or exempted
from mandatory mediation as provided by this rule.
68.8.2 Parties may arrange for mediation privately, may apply
to the court for an order of mediation, or may request services through
the Family Court mediation program by contacting the Director of Office
of Dispute Resolution Services to determine eligibility. To insure
that mediation is available to all parties, regardless of financial
standing; the Family Court Mediation Program shall provide services
based on the income of the parties in accordance with guidelines established
by the Office of Dispute Resolution Services and approved by the court
en banc. Parties seeking to participate in the Family Court Mediation
Program shall submit income information to the administrator of the
Office of Dispute Resolution Services on the form designated for that
purpose. Intake procedures performed by the Office of Dispute Resolution
Services to screen parties for mediation and to arrange for the delivery
of services, with the exception of reasonable suspicion of child abuse
or neglect, shall be considered part of the mediation proceedings
and treated as confidential under Supreme Court rule 88.08.
68.83 The Family Court Office of Dispute Resolution Services
shall maintain a copy of The Missouri Bar Dispute Resolution Neutrals
List and a list of mediators who are currently contracting to provide
services through Family Court sponsored mediation programs who meet
the qualifications under Supreme Court Rule 88.05. The lists shall
be made available to all parties upon request.
68.8.4 Any party, upon the expiration of thirty (30) days from
the date responsive pleadings are due on the original petition or
upon the expiration of sixty (60) days from the date of service when
no responsive pleading is required, may file a motion requesting the
Court to order mediation in the matter. Movant may name a mediator
in the request. Each party may petition the Court to disqualify one
mediator without stating cause within fifteen (15) days of the designation
of the mediator. Thereafter disqualification of a mediator shall be
for cause shown. If the parties are unable to agree on a mediator,
the court will appoint a mediator. The mediator shall advise the Court
of any fact bearing upon a conflict of interest or bias, or any other
facts that would be reason for his or her disqualification. If the
Court disqualifies a mediator, an order shall be entered naming a
qualified replacement. Nothing shall limit a mediator's ability to
refuse assignment of any mediation under this rule.
68.8.5 Some cases may be inappropriate for mediation, which
may include those with a history of child abuse or neglect or domestic
violence. The Court appointed mediator, and the Office of Dispute
Resolution Services in the case of matters participating in the court
sponsored mediation program, shall screen the parties prior to conducting
mediation sessions. If the case is deemed inappropriate for mediation,
the mediator or program director shall immediately file the Notice
of Mediation Compliance form with the Court.
68.8.6 Any party may request the court to waive the mediation
requirement for good cause shown. "Good cause" may be established
by specific averments showing that the case is not suitable for mediation,
or at the request of any party, the court may refer the case for screening
to determine the appropriateness of mediation. Screening procedures
performed by the Office of Dispute Resolution Services shall be confidential
pursuant to Supreme Court rule 88.08. The pre-screening report shall
indicate only whether mediation is or is not appropriate
68.8.7 A mediator assigned to provide services in a case by
the court or a court-sponsored program shall give the parties and
their counsel of record advance notice in writing of the time and
place of the initial mediation session. Any mediation beyond the initial
two hours shall proceed by mutual agreement of the parties. Counsel
for any party may attend the mediation sessions, but shall first notify
the mediator and all counsel of record of his or her intent to attend.
If counsel for any party desires to attend after receipt of such notice,
but is unavailable on the scheduled date, the mediation shall be rescheduled
at a time convenient to all parties and counsel. Counsel and clients
may communicate privately at any time during the mediation process.
The guardian ad litem for a minor child, if one has been appointed,
shall be considered a party to the proceeding and may participate
as a party in the mediation process. The mediator shall provide the
Court and counsel of record with a copy of the Notice of Mediation
Compliance signed by the mediator at the termination of mediation.
68.8.8 The confidentiality provisions of Rule 88.08 shall apply
to mediations undertaken to comply with this rule. Any mediator who
is required by statute or program guidelines to report reasonable
suspicion of child abuse or neglect shall so advise the parties and
counsel in writing upon appointment. Except for the completion of
the Notice of Compliance, the mediator shall make no other disclosures
of a confidential nature during or at the conclusion of mediation
without the consent of all participants. The identity of the party
who terminates mediation shall not be disclosed.
|